Google has been one of the pioneers in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) research and development. The company has made significant progress in the field, but as with any emerging technology, it’s not free of flaws. Despite its many achievements, Google AI Overviews still has some shortcomings, as evidenced by these four examples.
Firstly, the Google AI system has struggled to understand natural language processing (NLP) accurately. It has been seen that sometimes the system misinterprets the context of the message and provides an irrelevant response. This can be problematic, especially in the case of voice assistants, where users expect accurate and relevant responses.
Secondly, Google has been criticized for some of its AI biases. One such example is a study that found that Google’s image recognition algorithm was more likely to label people of color as “gorillas” than white people. This shows that Google’s AI algorithms are not perfect and can be influenced by biases in the data sets used to train them.
Thirdly, Google AI has also struggled to identify misinformation and fake news accurately. In the past, Google has faced criticism over its role in spreading misinformation during elections. Despite Google’s efforts to improve its algorithms, it’s still not perfect at distinguishing between genuine news and fake news.
Fourthly, Google AI is also not very good at recognizing sarcasm and irony. This can lead to misinterpretation of text or social media posts, which can be problematic for businesses or individuals who rely on accurate sentiment analysis.
In conclusion, Google AI Overviews is far from perfect. While the company has made significant strides in the field of AI, it still has some way to go before it can be considered flawless. While these examples may seem alarming, it’s important to remember that AI is still an emerging technology, and there is still much to learn about its capabilities and limitations. Nevertheless, Google and other tech companies must continue to improve their AI systems and address the flaws, biases, and issues that have been highlighted in recent years.